Making the Euthanasia Chamber

 


If the animal is largely inactive and small enough (CO2 euthanasia is not recommended for animals over 2 pounds), a one-gallon jar or juice pitcher works well, or a one-gallon plastic jug could be used if the top is partially cut off so it will hinge up and can later be taped closed. A box, open only at the top and about the size of a gallon jug, could also be used. Add familiar litter (for rodents), a special toy, or whatever might comfort your pet. Making a little nest and covering it with a cloth, or wadded or shredded paper, may help calm and comfort your pet as much as possible. Covering also prevents wandering about during the final minute. If the animal were free to walk about it would begin to stagger and act drunk or confused before loss of consciousness. This is not something you want to see--not how your pet would want you to remember them, so limit your pet's ability to move about. It may even be possible to get your pet to fall asleep.

If you are using a jar, cover the top with a piece of plastic with a hole made in it for the hose, and another small hole to allow the air to escape as the CO2 enters. You might want to suck on the hose to remove most of the air in the plastic bag containing the baking soda and container of vinegar before putting the hose into the euthanasia container (if you do a good job of pulling up all loose plastic, this step should not be required).

If you must hold the pet in order to comfort it, you could put your arm in the container along with the end of the hose, and wrap a cloth around both to partially seal the opening. The air in the container must be permitted to escape as the CO2 enters, so make sure the top is not completely sealed.

Initially the hose should extend about 2 inches into the chamber. When all is ready, hold the cup or glass through the plastic bag, and slowly pour out half of the vinegar so that it takes about 1 minute to pour one cup out and into the bag (leaving one cup of vinegar still in the cup or glass). You will hear a fizz as the acid reacts with the baking soda. Gas will begin to fill the bag, then flow through the hose and into the euthanasia chamber. Make sure the hose doesn't fall into the liquid, as the expanding gas would then force the liquid through the hose. Since CO2 is heavier than air, it will fall down into the euthanasia chamber mixing with the air, and so gradually increase the CO2 concentration. In 1 to 2 minutes the animal should be in deep anesthesia and breathing deeply. Touching an eye should produce no response. If you are holding your pet, it will be completely limp. If you are not holding the animal and can't see it, just shake the container a bit and listen. There should be no movement. Do not open the container to check or reach in as this will introduce air and possibly reawaken the animal.

If an animal remains alert and appears in distress, the concentration of CO2 was probably too high too quickly. If you tap on the container and there is no response and the animal appears unconscious but appears to be taking deep breaths, that is known as agonal respiration. It is, if it occurs, a normal part of the dying process. So when unconscious or unresponsive, that would be the time to go to the next step of flooding the chamber with pure CO2.

Once unconscious or unresponsive, push the hose down near the bottom of the container and pour out the remaining vinegar into the bag. When most of the fizzing subsides, you might squeeze the bag, if it seems to contain a lot of gas, to force out the remaining CO2. This final flow will flood the chamber with a high concentration of CO2 stopping respiration in minutes if not seconds. Now cover the chamber and wait 10-30 minutes before checking (longer for amphibians or reptiles).

Rats euthanized by increasing CO2 levels to 33% over 1 minute, then killed using high levels of CO2 while still in their home cage showed no signs of stress either by behavior or by subsequent blood tests for ACTH, glucose, and corticosterone which would be abnormal if the rats had experienced anything distressing. 2 This is strong evidence that CO2 euthanasia is as "good" a death as can be achieved in a home setting.

Materials Required

1. One gallon of white vinegar.
2. One pound box of baking soda.
3. Tablespoon to measure baking soda.
4. One-gallon container: Jar, pitcher, plastic jug, or box with opening only at top (euthanasia chamber).
5. Hose, 1/2 inch inside diameter, about 3 feet long.
6. One gallon size plastic bag--zip-lock works well (carbon dioxide chamber).
7. Twist tie to secure plastic bag to hose.
8. 16-ounce cup (measuring cup) or 16-ounce glass.
9. Rubber band or tape to secure hose to cup or glass on the outside near the top.
10. Plastic or cloth to partially seal the top of the euthanasia chamber around hose, or arm and hose, if using a jar or box.

 

Next:  A Variation in Method variationsm

        The Reptile Feeder Method reptilesm

         The Euthanasia Machine machinesm

          Concluding Remarks quest

Comments   

 
0 # David 2013-05-20 07:38
Wow, lot of work for your beloved rodent. Those years of enjoyment the family got from Ivan, the red eyed feeder mouse. (Well, 2 years anyway, damn lifespan!) Much easier and humane approach:

1. Put Ivan in a plastic grocery bag
2. Quickly swing the bag in the air, landing it soundly on a cement surface.
3. Twist tie and dispose into trash.

Takes about 30 seconds.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # JustMe 2013-05-21 15:50
Quoting David:
Wow, lot of work for your beloved rodent. Those years of enjoyment the family got from Ivan, the red eyed feeder mouse. (Well, 2 years anyway, damn lifespan!) Much easier and humane approach:

1. Put Ivan in a plastic grocery bag
2. Quickly swing the bag in the air, landing it soundly on a cement surface.
3. Twist tie and dispose into trash.

Takes about 30 seconds.


Okay, now that's just fucked up right there...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Guest 2013-05-11 12:07
And herein lies the problem. People who don't understand the instructions trying to euthanise anything could be a disaster, for them and the animal. I am glad you found a way to humanely kill mice, but putting it on a public website is, in my opinion, very irresponsible. There will be people out there who don't read the part where it says animals under 2 pounds, and will cause much suffering to their dog, cat, bunny, ferret or whatever. I really wish you would take down this site for the sake of those animals. Besides, 22 states have found that gas as a form of killing is inhumane and have banned it, so I would think that with that much evidence that the legislators surely looked out, that this would be a very outdated, inhumane method.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Jenna 2013-05-11 07:49
Might I remind everyone that this type of euthanasia (and this is not euthanasia... Because euthanasia means humane death) is ILLEGAL in most states.... ALSO practicing "veterinary medicine" without a degree or license is highly illegal and a felony!!!!! As is illegally killing animals... And especially certain wildlife which may be federally protected... Are you getting the picture here??? FELONY..... FELONY....FELON Y.... Is this method really worth going to jail for just to save a few bucks?? If an animal is injured...call animal control, your local animal shelter or a wildlife rescue that can help you and give you options!!!!! The method of C02 is being outlawed because it is CRUEL... PAINFUL... and INHUMANE and is excruciating!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3 # tonho 2013-05-11 07:26
ahah, cmon dude...no free speech?...ahhhh "amuricans"...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3 # tonho 2013-05-11 07:23
i say gas chamber for humans again...lets do it..teach us how to do it buddy...lets go, kill killkill killllll....ah the "amuricans"...s howing the world how to continue being retarded...good riddance US.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # JustMe 2013-05-21 15:48
Quoting tonho:
i say gas chamber for humans again...lets do it..teach us how to do it buddy...lets go, kill killkill killllll....ah the "amuricans"...showing the world how to continue being retarded...good riddance US.


Whoa, calm your tits there, Tonho - Did you know that people in other countries beat the animals (dogs, cats...errr, anything that moves) before eating them? Cats are simply dipped in scalding hot water ALIVE to remove their fur for eating!!?? China, Africa, all over the world people are doing horrendous shit to animals...and you're blowing off at the mouth about "Americans!!?" WTF? We "Amuricans" are pretty "superior" in this regard, nowhere near as barbaric, my man. You need to check yourself before you wreck yourself, fella. Good day to ya, dickhead!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Snoopy 2013-05-09 12:32
Just had to kill a squirrel this morning that my cat messed up pretty bad. Poor thing was suffering, and I put him out of his misery. I feel horrible, as I love squirrels, and this little guy was a juvenile. Could have fallen from a tree first... IDK. Wish I knew about this method. I will use this on other live animals that are suffering for now on. I hated killing it, but it had no use of it's back legs and it was clearly suffering. Is this painful at all to the animal or do they just pass out and die? Is it like so me other posters said, where it's like putting a pillow over someone's face?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # Eric 2013-05-09 22:36
A couple of days ago someone apparently posted a link to this site on their Facebook page and their like-minded friends have felt compelled to express their scathing contempt, disgust, anger, rage....legal threats, even what could be interpreted as a death threat. Included among the many baseless claims is one that I delete posts from those who disagree, however stridently, with me. Actually, with the one exception of a person who tried to deface this site by repeatedly posting the single character "." over and over, I have not, but perhaps I should reconsider. Allowing trolls to rant confuses others, but the reality is that views differ. Considering the various claims and critically assessing them is what needs to be done, so just do it. Evidence suggests rodents are averse to high levels of CO2 as they will leave an area of increasing CO2 concentration if allowed to. Does this mean they experience pain--as in horrible unimaginable pillow-over-the ir-face suffering? That CO2 was once used on humans for anaesthesia, on patients who did not report being rendered unconscious by CO2 in horrific pillow-over-the -face terms, is worth pondering. Maybe 'some discomfort' might be more inline with the actual experience. So some distress may briefly be experienced before 'passing out', but if euthanasia is being considered, the animal's suffering should be far beyond what CO2 exposure may or may not cause.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # A.Ryan 2013-05-08 19:20
GerbilFriend, in case you haven't noticed, there is a blogger under the conclusions section who lists SEVERAL resources from veterinary medical journals that is MUCH more recent than the single resource that you posted. If you care to educate yourself further, please head over to that section of the site. Cassis has done a WONDERFUL job of sighting current research! Best regards, A.J. Ryan
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # A.Ryan 2013-05-08 18:38
GerbalFriend, in case you did not notice, there is not a single resource that you listed that is less than 10 years old. Current studies have shown thst the CO2 method of euthanasia is painful an drawnout. The addition of bursts of O2 into the chamber only leads to a peeks and trenches method of anesthetic state that can bring on moments of painful consciousness during the euthanasia process. Please re-evaluate your resources!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # GerbilFriend 2013-05-08 19:03
Firstly I only listed a single resource.
Secondly, the paper was submitted June 10, 1994. Therefore it is less than 9 years old.

Aside from that, you may be right about the "peeks" and trenches if using a method of O2 bursts into the chamber. Which is why the study does not even include that as a method but rather suggests a constant, start to finish, consistent supply of oxygen.

Lastly, if you have a theory to suggest on the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of a method I would recommend supplying the supporting information from a trusted and official source. Otherwise your claims look ignorant, unfounded and solely personal.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # GerbilFriend 2013-05-08 20:17
Also, apparently I am living in the past. I am completely wrong about the time since paper was submitted.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # GerbilFriend 2013-05-08 18:26
Anyone actually interested in the merits of this method - and not just impulsively condemning anyone interested perhaps in saving money unnecessarily spent on expensive euthanasia in an alienating and discomforting environment (for the animal) for the purposes of re-allocating that money to afford a life-saving surgery on another animal that can actually be helped - should read this interesting document detailing the assertion of the most humane carbon dioxide method of euthanasia as determined by the parameters set forth by the American Veterinary Medical Association.

http://www.unobv.com/afbeeldingen/PDF%20Downloads/3.%20Papers.pdf

This being noted, I would suggest that the poster re-evaluate the stated method to include the importance of the constant presence of oxygen in the gases of the euthanasia chamber.

Thank you poster for providing a more personal alternative so that I may spend the last moments of my friend's life together with her where she is comfortable.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # GerbilFriend 2013-05-08 18:29
http://www.unobv.com/afbeeldingen/PDF%20Downloads/3.%20Papers.pdf
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # GerbilFriend 2013-05-08 18:55
I apologize for having the URL cut short; must be something to do with the phone.

.../3.%20Papers.pdf

is the proper and full end of the address.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # Eric 2013-05-09 23:44
Thanks for the link, of interest. Adding O2 to CO2 would seem to be an improvement and in labs both are usually readily available. In the home, generally not. Isoflurane may be even better, but this site is not about the best method of euthanasia for use by vets or in labs which are questions current research is looking into.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # sloane 2013-05-11 07:22
Eric you are one sick sadisitic bastard. No one 'normal" does this to even a termite. YOU are the one that needs to be euthanized in a gas chamber! Don't you know what the animal goes through? They SUFFOCATE!
Hope you get terminal cancer and die off...you probably will.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Theresa 2013-05-08 17:34
This is so wrong in so many ways. This should be a crime and you should be arrested. You damn sure shouldn't own a pet of any kind. If you can't afford, or just don't want to pay, then don't get a pet. Take this torturous method off the internet! It's cruel and inhumane. I am truly sickened beyond words.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Guest 2013-05-08 15:20
Oh my God i am truly shocked as to what i am reading. This is absolutely horrendous. Euthanasia may only be practiced by a qualified Veterinary Surgeon for a start! Posting a 'how to kill your pet' guide on the internet is beyond sickening.
Please people, if you have a pet that is so poorly you're considering starving it of Oxygen (please don't be convinced that in any way this is a pain-free/stres s-free death), you MUST take it to a QUALIFIED VETERINARY SURGEON. That is what they are there for!!

Written by a horrified RVN!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Really upset@this 2013-05-08 12:40
SICK! disgusting.. reporting to the authorises- vets euthanase animals by giving an overdose of an anaesthetic agent--- this is suffocation.... so imagine chocking your poor little pet's windpipe until they run out of oxygen....or suffocate them under a pillow using the "smother" method. DISGUSTING.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Jon Bray 2013-05-08 05:57
Although it isn't the way (us) vets would normally do it I remember CO2 being on the list of approved slaughter techniques (for pigs in the UK). Certain concentrations are distressing but it looks like the original poster has done his/her homework.

Those after more information may like to look here: http://www.butina.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/images/articles/cabon_dioxide.pdf

While this technique is not without its pitfalls if you get the concentration wrong, small pets probably don't much appreciate being put in a car, waiting in a waiting room with predators, then being either restrained and injected or given inhalation anaesthesia (although a newer anaesthetic, sevofluorane, is supposed not to bother them as much). So I'm not really ready to chastise the OP.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # Eric 2013-05-09 23:51
Quite the interesting link. Thanks. I didn't know that "The anaesthetic properties of carbon dioxide have been known for more than 150 years... Carbon dioxide was used extensively in the U.S.A. in the 1950ties as an anaesthetic in hospitals and clinics, and among other indications [for] deliveries." Better anaesthetics followed, but still....couldn 't have been all that bad.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Guest 2013-05-21 07:40
Quoting Jon Bray:
Although it isn't the way (us) vets would normally do it I remember CO2 being on the list of approved slaughter techniques (for pigs in the UK). Certain concentrations are distressing but it looks like the original poster has done his/her homework.

Those after more information may like to look here: http://www.butina.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/images/articles/cabon_dioxide.pdf

While this technique is not without its pitfalls if you get the concentration wrong, small pets probably don't much appreciate being put in a car, waiting in a waiting room with predators, then being either restrained and injected or given inhalation anaesthesia (although a newer anaesthetic, sevofluorane, is supposed not to bother them as much). So I'm not really ready to chastise the OP.


Thank you, Jon - finally, someone with some sense.

I was told by my vet that it would cost 30 bucks to euthanize my son's tiny gerbil. I don't think so, the rat only cost us 10 or so bucks! The above method is doable and works; just like in the vets office except my son's rat never has to leave his cage (nor will he even suspect anything).

For the rest of you Drama Queens - get a grip. I'm so sick of you running your mouths when you have no idea what you're talking about. You really need to go harass all the animal breeders who overbreed animals for the sake of fattening their wallets! If someone found this site, it's likely they were looking for a humane way to put their pet to rest at home, so up yours with your accusations and nonsense talk. I'm willing to bet a lot of you eat steak...go look how cows are slaughtered. I guess that's okay, though, right...as long as you can fill your fat gut! What a bunch of a-holes!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Caroline 2013-05-08 05:22
Eric you are a sick individual with obviously little to no regard for any creature large or small. This is suffocation and these animals are suffering in their final moments.
Do you have any idea of the pain and suffering people will be inflicting on their ' beloved ' pets by following your sick & twisted ' method '??
Did you fail to make it to Vet School? .......Or did you flunk out and just decide to make up your own methods
There's a special place in hell for individuals like you
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # JustMe 2013-05-21 07:44
Quoting Caroline:
Eric you are a sick individual with obviously little to no regard for any creature large or small. This is suffocation and these animals are suffering in their final moments.
Do you have any idea of the pain and suffering people will be inflicting on their ' beloved ' pets by following your sick & twisted ' method '??
Did you fail to make it to Vet School? .......Or did you flunk out and just decide to make up your own methods
There's a special place in hell for individuals like you


First of all, see my response below Jon Bray's, it was meant for people just like you.

Also, if you truly believe in Heaven and Hell, Caroline, you may want to open your bible and read what it says regarding animals...just sayin', girlfriend.

With that being said, have no fear, Eric, you will make it to Heaven, my friend, no worries ;)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # RVN 2013-05-08 04:44
This is practically suffocation, and it's absolutely disgusting. Anyone who even thinks about "performing" any of these tasks I BEG of you not to - for your pet's sake. I can't think of anything more terrifying than suffocation. Vets and vet techs/nurses are trained in actual humane euthanasia and our job is to make the process as stress free as possible. These methods are barbaric and you should ALL be ashamed of yourselves!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+11 # Deb 2013-05-07 23:10
What a miserable way for any creature to die. You are further practicing shitty veterinarian medicine without a license. How dare you make this seem "humane". I implore you to take this horrific site down!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+9 # A.Ryan 2013-05-07 20:28
Are you always going to delete the posts of people who disagree with you, or will you let them be seen so people have a chance to see what it really means to do this?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+9 # A.Ryan 2013-05-07 19:48
I find your website to be extremely irresponsible. There is a reason why euthanasia methods are handled by trained medical professionals. The CO2 method of euthanasia has been discredited for a reason. It is a slow and frightening method of death, which is why, when used at all, it is only performed on animals under heavy sedation. The fact that you are simply not going to respond to the misunderstandin gs of the people who read this is absolutely disgusting. Your just going to put this out and then simply ignore the possibly of people misusing this info at the extreme risk of the animals in danger. I find you vile, ignorant, and completely liable for your actions on this site.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # JustMe 2013-05-21 07:48
Quoting A.Ryan:
I find your website to be extremely irresponsible. There is a reason why euthanasia methods are handled by trained medical professionals. The CO2 method of euthanasia has been discredited for a reason. It is a slow and frightening method of death, which is why, when used at all, it is only performed on animals under heavy sedation. The fact that you are simply not going to respond to the misunderstandings of the people who read this is absolutely disgusting. Your just going to put this out and then simply ignore the possibly of people misusing this info at the extreme risk of the animals in danger. I find you vile, ignorant, and completely liable for your actions on this site.



Yeah, that "reason" is so a vet can charge you out the ass for nothing considering you can do the same thing as the vet just as easily at home. You people, I swear...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-9 # Louisa 2012-12-02 13:26
Can I use this method on the birds that my cat catches and tortures half to death?
Also, we've put a collar and bell on the cat, does anyone have any further tips? .... other than "if you love your cat you'll keep it inside". Thanks
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-10 # Eric 2012-12-02 15:58
Can be used on birds. One alternative to bells is the 'cat bib' which can be bought or google 'make cat bib' and make your own. Bells do work, just not 100% of time.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-11 # Kathy McKenna 2012-11-15 18:03
I just put my boy Coco to sleep using your method and it's very good. However, I would rather be able to do this with my hammy's while they are already asleep in their own homes. I use 10 gallon aquariums for my hammys. I can cover the aquarium opening with plastic wrap easily enough, but how much vinegar and baking soda would I use. Should I just use 5 or ten times the amounts? Also, since my hammy's homes usually have levels, I probably wouldn't need a separate chamber for the mixture. I would use the technique you describe in the reptile feeder method. Right? I would really appreciate your reply before I ever need to do this again. I would have been happier if I could have left Coco in his home. Thank you.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-9 # Eric 2012-11-16 00:29
A 10 gallon aquarium covered in plastic wrap should work. To fill with CO2 you'd need to mix a half gallon of vinegar and 3/4 cup baking soda slowly at first. A moderate mixing bowl, something that would hold a gallon or so that also fits inside the aquarium, could be used. A hole made in the plastic with a funnel sticking through could direct the vinegar into the baking soda. Pour 32 oz. vinegar slowly, then the remaining 32 oz. faster but slowly enough that foam doesn't spill over. Try first with an empty aquarium. But once set up and asleep, passage should be quiet.

If you have a piece of hose, a plastic bag with 3/4 cup baking soda and 1/2 gallon jug with vinegar in it might work better. With hose in bag and sealed, pouring the vinegar out creates gas that is then forced into the covered aquarium with little chance of foam getting in.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-10 # Kathy McKenna 2012-11-16 01:13
Thank you so much. I wish I'd known this years ago. You're the small animals guardian angel.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-10 # Tron 2012-10-22 00:19
Thank you ..... I rang the vet to ask how they would euthanase the mouse and they would have put a needle straight into the heart and said it would be better not to watch - this way meant our mouse was able to be at home and with familiar people and not have a painful injection, thank you so much
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-12 # Patricia 2012-10-21 08:31
Thank you. We are vacationing in a remote part of our state and isolated from veterinary care. Our little dog has terminal cancer, is 16 years old, and no longer eating or drinking. We were concerned that her dehydration is painful, and have learned that it is not. She also appears to have suffered a stroke as she sometimes sits for long periods with her neck fully extended and her eyes closed. Her breathing hasn't slowed yet, and she will actually become agitated with fast breathing if we attempt to see if she will eat from our hand or put a pain med in her mouth. Confusion is obvious. Thank you for this assistance. I don't know yet if we will administer euthanasia. Knowing that she isn't in pain for the present is comfort enough and she may go quietly on her own. Patricia
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+11 # Vet Tech 2012-11-23 11:35
Patricia- This method is NOT approved for dogs- this is for animals weighing less than two pounds. CO2 is not appropriate for dogs- many states have already outlawed it while others are in the process of doing away with the gas chambers due to public outcry, protests and studies showing that it is inhumane for dogs. Again, the method here is approved for animals like rats and hamsters, weighing less than two pounds. A dog has a different respiratory system than a rodent does and you will be guilty of animal cruelty if you do this to your dog. Since you don't even know if you need to put your dog to sleep yet or what is going on with her, you obviously have enough time to cut your vacation short to see a vet. Giving your dog a humane death should be higher priority than your vacation- she gave you 16 wonderful years and the least you can do is let her pass with dignity.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Eric 2012-11-23 16:34
Thanks for replying. I missed this post somehow and would have replied much as you did, repeating that this method is not approved or appropriate for dogs (or cats). I get requests for a method for large pets, there is a need for one, but have no answer I feel comfortable suggesting.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Caroline 2013-05-08 05:13
Euthanasia should be administered by a REAL Veterinarian - This is SUFFOCATION - Do you want your ' beloved ' pet to suffer in his final moments? Does he not deserve better?? Do the right thing and take your pet to a Veterinarian to put a humane end to her suffering.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # grateful 2012-10-11 05:05
thank-you, worked perfectly on mouse. greatly appreciated.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3 # Eric 2012-07-01 19:07
The original comment widget this site used to have died an unnatural death, and, no, it was not euthanized. With it was lost hundreds of comments ranging from heart felt gratitude to scathing contempt. So let's start over.

Enter your email address if you want to be notified if someone comments on your comment. Otherwise don't--not required.

July 1, 2012
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-7 # chana 2012-08-03 17:26
Thank you for this. My rabbit is in terrible shape and although he's still eating, I know he's also miserable and it won't be long till he stops eating. The alternative plastic bag method just looks like suffocating,whi ch wouldn't be too humane and I'm not sure type of box would be sealed enough to make the Co2 effective. Can you elaborate?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Eric 2012-09-05 08:16
I've tried to explain the methods as best I can but if I've failed and you don't understand them I'd suggest not trying to use any of them. Any attempt to elaborate would merely be repetitious. See a vet if at all possible or ask someone else you know to read this site.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Caroline 2013-05-08 05:11
This is why we have Veterinarians. Humane euthanasia NOT suffocation. Take your poor rabbit to a REAL Vet!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # JustMe 2013-05-21 08:20
Quoting Caroline:
This is why we have Veterinarians. Humane euthanasia NOT suffocation. Take your poor rabbit to a REAL Vet!


Oh, Caroline...*sig h* Please enlighten yourself and Google some horror stories that have occurred during a "real vet" euthanasia procedure." It's not always humane, sweetie...and pet owners go home completely traumatized.

On a side note, I do understand that vets do their very best for a humane death...just explaining that some beloved pets nearly jump off a table, poop, stomp around in it for a few seconds, and then die. Even if it is supposedly "rare," it happens...shit happens.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Guest 2013-05-08 15:28
Please take your rabbit to a Vet for humane euthanasia. Your pet deserves to die with dignity.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # Jenna 2013-05-11 07:55
What you are planning on doing to your rabbit is not only illegal... It is painful!!! Take the rabbit to an animal shelter and surrender him where they can euthanize him HUMANELY!!!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

 

External Links


Top 10 Poems from Alysion's

Bucket List of Poems to Read Before You Die

 

 

Other sites by Alysion

Popular Sites:Mindfulness Sites:Thrival Sites:Satirical Sites: Literature/Poetry Sites:Interesting Sites:

Visit our Zazzle store:
Fine Poster Art

Support this site: Visit our Zazzle store featuring ultra hi-res images of artworks, Hubble/ESA/NASA space images, Mandelbrot fractals, maps and more. Images up to 525 megapixels allow for fine printing at the largest sizes. Consider giving a fine print as a gift that could hang on someone's wall for a hundred years or more.

Webmaster           Privacy Policy           Contact Us